I. Denisov
To Win
TBD
To Win
Matthew Mendez vs Ivan Denisov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L W W L
Form
L L L W L W L W W LHead To Head: Mendez 1 - 0 Denisov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mendez winning 2 and Denisov winning 1. The last match between Mendez and Denisov was at the M15 Nules, 29-10-2019, Q3, Clay with Matthew Mendez getting the victory 7-5 4-6 10-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matthew Mendez | 1 |
| Ivan Denisov | 0 |
M15 Nules(29-10-2019)
7
5
4
6
10
5
| Mendez | Stats | Denisov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (4-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (51-41) | Career Total W/L | 47% (100-111) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Denisov VS TBD
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 10-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matthew Mendez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-0 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Arklon Huertas Del Pino
Player
Matthew Mendez
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Mendez
Player
Simon Yitbarek
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Denisov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Ivan Denisov
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lucio Ratti
Player
Ivan Denisov
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Ivan Denisov
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Kousuke Ogura
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Ivan Denisov
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Rafael Goldberg Alviani
Player
Ivan Denisov
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
24
Total Points Won
19
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Ivan Denisov
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
3
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (51/41) | Win/Loss | 47% (100/111) |
| 54% (111/93) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (242/243) |
| 52% (996/917) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2370/2314) |
| 51% (24/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (29/41) |
| 66% (27/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (63/59) |
| 0% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 30 | Aces Total | 313 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 70 | Total Double Faults | 378 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:12 |
| 267.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.57 |
| 64% (1378/2149) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4786/7967) |
| 60% (828/1378) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3121/4786) |
| 50% (386/771) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1576/3181) |
| 46% (83/182) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (344/843) |
| 39% (777/2000) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3295/8105) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 57% (51/38) | Futures W/L | 48% (95/102) |
| 56% (51/91) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (99/208) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (20/44) |
| 58% (11/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 34% (22/64) |
| 84% (51/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (107/86) |
| 16% (51/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (107/21) |
| 20% (41/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (104/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
